As anyone who has been reading this week knows the ladies over at Teacher
Mentor Texts have devoted the month of March to Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic
fiction. So far I have written five
stories that fit into one of the two genres for my own “Bleak Week”.
Did you miss the stories? Here are the stories for quick reference.
Off (Dystopian)
Just Another Day (Post-Apocalyptic)
The Audience at Home (Dystopian)
Night Hunt (Post-Apocalyptic)
The Way (Dystopian)
Now, as promised here are my thoughts on the two genres.
*****
I have a love/hate relationship with Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic fiction. I think some amazing stories can be found within the two genres but I also feel the two genres often are at odds with one of my strongest viewpoints of humanity.
Before we get heavy into this discussion I want to make sure we are all on the same page. Here are the short general definitions that Kellee came up for the two genres.
You can find her first post for the event discussing her definitions here.
Dystopian: Dystopian stories normally take place in a society that has pulled themselves back together after a disaster or epidemic and now has a controlling government where the citizens are repressed.
Post-Apocalyptic: Post-apocalyptic stories take place after a disaster that has devastated the world or region the character lives in. The protagonists focus is primarily survival.
Ultimately both genres focus on the classic “what if” scenario. They generally focus on what comes next after something has gone wrong. Often it is something pretty damn bad.
The end of the world/crumble of society often sucks pretty hard.
That is my problem with the two genres. They generally end up being depressing as hell. There is a reason I nicknamed this week “Bleak Week” for my writing. Both genres have a tendency to create a rather bleak outlook of what comes next. Real life is full of bleak enough stuff. I usually like to see happier stuff in my literature. I want that cheesy happy ending at the end. I don’t really want to see people suffer for like 200 pages just for sake of high art.
I’m so sick of the “We were the monsters all along” messaging that creeps its way into the more gritty forms of literature. The reason is that it goes against my personal viewpoint of humanity on a fundamental level.
I love humanity. I think we are absolutely amazing. I don’t believe in the Christian idea that we are evil and must repent for the evil that starts out in our hearts. I strongly believe the exact opposite. I firmly believe that humanity as a whole is inherently good and evil individuals are the exception to the rule.
I thus personally have a lot of issues with a lot of Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic stories because I feel on a basic level they are bad mouthing something that I love so dearly. My belief is that when the time comes we will not go past the brink. We would see the errors of our way and come together to build a better society instead of a flawed one.
With that said, that isn’t nearly as interesting to read. J
The other side of the coin is that I feel both genres offer a LOT of creative wiggle room for creating awesome stories. They have the advantage of being built on a strong foundation. They are each built off our current expectations of the present. It is only by utilizing those current expectations and modifying them that the stories of the bleak future gain significance.
Dystopian stories are warnings. They show us what can happen if we aren’t careful. They are a lighthouse built on the shore that is the future. For my personal taste every good dystopian story should end with the destruction of the corrupted control group falling out of power as freedom gains wings once again. Why? I feel it is human nature to destroy such creations and I think it creates a basic innate sense of rightness when we read about another one crumpling to ruins.
Post-Apocalyptic stories are propaganda for human resiliency. They show us the horrors that we as a species can endure. They show us how close to destruction we can come and still walk away survivors. We may not be roaches but our spirits are indestructible.
I think humor can act as a great tonic to help us digest these types of stories. One of my favorite video games of all time is a game called Fallout. It is a computer role-playing game set in a Post-Apocalyptic setting. The bombs dropped and most of humanity got wiped out. The whole game has a deep pervasive humor in it that helps to make the horrors of the world a little less horrible.
The reason this is important is because humanity needs light to help fight the dark. I hate reading fiction where the characters are in dire situations and that is all that you experience. Show me them trying their best to enjoy a moment between the horror. Have them make terrible jokes and laugh about things they shouldn’t be laughing about. Show me them trying to remain human in the face of truly terrible things.
I will gladly admit that I’m not the best at following my own advice here. The five stories I wrote didn’t have a lot of humor in them. Of course with a smaller medium like a short story you need to pick and choose and cut out a lot of the extra crap. With that said I tried to maintain some element of hope in all of them. Hope should be something that always creeps into both genres.
When hope isn’t constantly in the background of a Dystopian or Post-Apocalyptic story that is when I get annoyed. The Walking Dead series is a good example of a series where I think hope is hard to find. I understand what Robert Kirkman was trying to show. He was trying to show all of the hardships but it ends up becoming one terrible thing after another with very little good to balance things out.
That is the danger of the two genres. It is easy to simply dwell on the negative and the horror and look past the beauty that one can find if one keeps an open mind. Both genres create a huge open canvas and countless stories can be told. However, I feel all too often the canvas is painted with darkness and blood and the first new plant breaking through the broken soil is lost in the paint.
Both genres can be absolutely amazing. However, they both have a tendency to become bleak affairs that magnify our weaknesses while ignoring our strengths. That is why I have such a complicated relationship with the two genres. I just see so much light and goodness in humanity and the two genres often don’t share that viewpoint.
Did you miss the stories? Here are the stories for quick reference.
Off (Dystopian)
Just Another Day (Post-Apocalyptic)
The Audience at Home (Dystopian)
Night Hunt (Post-Apocalyptic)
The Way (Dystopian)
Now, as promised here are my thoughts on the two genres.
*****
I have a love/hate relationship with Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic fiction. I think some amazing stories can be found within the two genres but I also feel the two genres often are at odds with one of my strongest viewpoints of humanity.
Before we get heavy into this discussion I want to make sure we are all on the same page. Here are the short general definitions that Kellee came up for the two genres.
You can find her first post for the event discussing her definitions here.
Dystopian: Dystopian stories normally take place in a society that has pulled themselves back together after a disaster or epidemic and now has a controlling government where the citizens are repressed.
Post-Apocalyptic: Post-apocalyptic stories take place after a disaster that has devastated the world or region the character lives in. The protagonists focus is primarily survival.
Ultimately both genres focus on the classic “what if” scenario. They generally focus on what comes next after something has gone wrong. Often it is something pretty damn bad.
The end of the world/crumble of society often sucks pretty hard.
That is my problem with the two genres. They generally end up being depressing as hell. There is a reason I nicknamed this week “Bleak Week” for my writing. Both genres have a tendency to create a rather bleak outlook of what comes next. Real life is full of bleak enough stuff. I usually like to see happier stuff in my literature. I want that cheesy happy ending at the end. I don’t really want to see people suffer for like 200 pages just for sake of high art.
I’m so sick of the “We were the monsters all along” messaging that creeps its way into the more gritty forms of literature. The reason is that it goes against my personal viewpoint of humanity on a fundamental level.
I love humanity. I think we are absolutely amazing. I don’t believe in the Christian idea that we are evil and must repent for the evil that starts out in our hearts. I strongly believe the exact opposite. I firmly believe that humanity as a whole is inherently good and evil individuals are the exception to the rule.
I thus personally have a lot of issues with a lot of Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic stories because I feel on a basic level they are bad mouthing something that I love so dearly. My belief is that when the time comes we will not go past the brink. We would see the errors of our way and come together to build a better society instead of a flawed one.
With that said, that isn’t nearly as interesting to read. J
The other side of the coin is that I feel both genres offer a LOT of creative wiggle room for creating awesome stories. They have the advantage of being built on a strong foundation. They are each built off our current expectations of the present. It is only by utilizing those current expectations and modifying them that the stories of the bleak future gain significance.
Dystopian stories are warnings. They show us what can happen if we aren’t careful. They are a lighthouse built on the shore that is the future. For my personal taste every good dystopian story should end with the destruction of the corrupted control group falling out of power as freedom gains wings once again. Why? I feel it is human nature to destroy such creations and I think it creates a basic innate sense of rightness when we read about another one crumpling to ruins.
Post-Apocalyptic stories are propaganda for human resiliency. They show us the horrors that we as a species can endure. They show us how close to destruction we can come and still walk away survivors. We may not be roaches but our spirits are indestructible.
I think humor can act as a great tonic to help us digest these types of stories. One of my favorite video games of all time is a game called Fallout. It is a computer role-playing game set in a Post-Apocalyptic setting. The bombs dropped and most of humanity got wiped out. The whole game has a deep pervasive humor in it that helps to make the horrors of the world a little less horrible.
The reason this is important is because humanity needs light to help fight the dark. I hate reading fiction where the characters are in dire situations and that is all that you experience. Show me them trying their best to enjoy a moment between the horror. Have them make terrible jokes and laugh about things they shouldn’t be laughing about. Show me them trying to remain human in the face of truly terrible things.
I will gladly admit that I’m not the best at following my own advice here. The five stories I wrote didn’t have a lot of humor in them. Of course with a smaller medium like a short story you need to pick and choose and cut out a lot of the extra crap. With that said I tried to maintain some element of hope in all of them. Hope should be something that always creeps into both genres.
When hope isn’t constantly in the background of a Dystopian or Post-Apocalyptic story that is when I get annoyed. The Walking Dead series is a good example of a series where I think hope is hard to find. I understand what Robert Kirkman was trying to show. He was trying to show all of the hardships but it ends up becoming one terrible thing after another with very little good to balance things out.
That is the danger of the two genres. It is easy to simply dwell on the negative and the horror and look past the beauty that one can find if one keeps an open mind. Both genres create a huge open canvas and countless stories can be told. However, I feel all too often the canvas is painted with darkness and blood and the first new plant breaking through the broken soil is lost in the paint.
Both genres can be absolutely amazing. However, they both have a tendency to become bleak affairs that magnify our weaknesses while ignoring our strengths. That is why I have such a complicated relationship with the two genres. I just see so much light and goodness in humanity and the two genres often don’t share that viewpoint.